The Innocence Project of Texas
Member Login
Register Blog
 
Home Contact
 
Junk Science
Even before the television show “CSI” became popular, juries and judges have tended to believe what “scientific experts” say in criminal cases. While scientific evidence can be a tremendously beneficial crime-solving tool, the use of inaccurate and fraudulent junk science has plagued the Texas criminal justice system for years.

Specifically, junk science in Texas has taken the form of false autopsies, inaccurate evaluations of hair and fiber evidence, dog scent lineups, and the use of now disproven arson investigation techniques. The Houston Crime Lab scandal is stark proof of how “grossly misleading” reports in the areas of serology and DNA testing have also been used time and time again to win convictions in Texas.

In response to the wrongful convictions that have resulted from the use of junk science in courtrooms, the Innocence Project of Texas recently launched a campaign against this practice. As part of our junk science campaign, we hope to exonerate men and women who were convicted via the use of inaccurate and fraudulent scientific evidence, to educate the public on the nature of the junk science problem, and to point the way forward for reform.

For more information on the junk science problem, please visit the reports listed below.

Innocence Project of Texas Report
Dog Scent Lineups: A Junk Science Injustice
Download Now

National Research Council Report
Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States

Request Assistance
Why Give
Keep Up With Our Activities - Blog
 
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Follow Us On Facebook Twitter